none -> Diamond Dave wrote:
 n> Diamond Dave -> Steve Winn wrote:
 DD>>   Re: Aspectnet?
 DD>>   By: Steve Winn #1 @1931000*1 to
 DD>> Diamond Dave @QWKNET*81 on Wed Jan 31 2007 10:29 pm

 >>> So in short, your BBS is still connected to me via AspectNET but
 DD>> everything
 >>> gated so you are really a part of VirtualNET.

 DD>> I looked at the VirtualNet list from your website. It shows several
 n> BBS
 DD>> systems
 DD>> that are no longer in operation. How current is this list? (It shows
 DD>> today's
 DD>> date, but when was it last "screened"?)
 n> hey it's been a long time.
 n> I use my mailers outbound age to trigger a disconnect in the bbs net
 n> config.
 n> i use 80 days old as a base line.
 n> then because of redundancy the remaining mail waits another 80 days
 n> before being purged usualy.
 n> you know with the leave-return rate being high the bbslist's hardly ever
 n> get purged. they more often get updated when the system returns.

 n> My suggestion, dont use the list for bbs lists for operating systems!!
 n> without checking them first.
damit that was me

--- Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227)
 * Origin: <The Harbinger Jamnntpd news://vtdl.net> (63:63/1)