AT2k Design BBS Message Area
Casually read the BBS message area using an easy to use interface. Messages are categorized exactly like they are on the BBS. You may post new messages or reply to existing messages! You are not logged in. Login here for full access privileges. |
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to General LAW Q&A <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
|
||||||
From | To | Subject | Date/Time | |||
ZED | LEGEND | Re: No Child Support... |
July 23, 1995 12:00 AM * |
|||
-=> Quoting Legend #130 @1810006*1 to Zed #1 @1915020*1 <=- L#@> Re: Re: No Child Support... > L#@> Men don't pay for their wives' lawyers unless it's been shown in court > L#@> that the wife suffered inability to be represented because of her > L#@> husband. > Like what? Tell me, what do you mean? L#@> Like he prevented her from getting any jobs because no wife of HIS was L#@> going to work. Now, a woman who could have worked outside, but chose L#@> not to is going to have a more difficult time with that. L#@> <<The Legend>> Okay. I realize there are some men who feel that way, but many more aren't threatened by that. And shouldn't be. Why any man would want to "prevent" his wife from working is beyond me, we should all know by now that a fullfilling job can make for a fullfilled and happier spouse, the "extra income" even being sometimes secondary to the success of the union. Men still don't pay because she works? Dubious, if her job is low paid relative to his. Z�D! ___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12 |
||||||
|
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to General LAW Q&A <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
Execution Time: 0.0149 seconds If you experience any problems with this website or need help, contact the webmaster. VADV-PHP Copyright © 2002-2024 Steve Winn, Aspect Technologies. All Rights Reserved. Virtual Advanced Copyright © 1995-1997 Roland De Graaf. |