| AT2k Design BBS's VADV-PHP Home |
|
|
AT2k Design BBS Message Area
Casually read the BBS message area using an easy to use interface. Messages are categorized exactly like they are on the BBS. You may post new messages or reply to existing messages! You are not logged in. Login here for full access privileges. |
| Previous Message | Next Message | Back to General LAW Q&A <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
|
||||||
| From | To | Subject | Date/Time | |||
|
Black Widow | ZED | Re: Appeals |
July 26, 1995 7:45 AM * |
||
Re: Re: Appeals
> Let's assume that the courts are -not- prejudiced, and are within the law
> as the first scenerio. I would be happy to see a sampling of the official
> reasons cited as to why my thinking is wrong per the second case. "A young
> child needs his mother" won't cut it, please give me something concrete!
> Z�D!
Well, I don't konw if this is what you are looking for or not. My ex fought
for custody and a big part of the reason he didn't get it, is he's an
alcoholic with 3 DWI convictions and no driver's license. Add that to the
charges of spousal abuse and the fact that I had him removed by the courts
from the house for it. If he didn't have those strikes against him, he might
have gotten custody. It certainly wasn't decided on gender alone.
The Black Widow Reigns Supreme
���Ŀ � � ��Ŀ � � � ��Ŀ ��Ŀ ��Ŀ ��Ŀ ��Ŀ For Rabbit Enthusiasts
� ��Ĵ �� � � � ��Ĵ ���� ���� �� � � (919) 217-8448 VFC288
� � � ���� ����� � � � � � � ���� � � Knightdale, N. Carolina
|
||||||
|
||||||
General LAW Q&A 
| Previous Message | Next Message | Back to General LAW Q&A <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
Execution Time: 0.0171 seconds If you experience any problems with this website or need help, contact the webmaster. VADV-PHP Copyright © 2002-2024 Steve Winn, Aspect Technologies. All Rights Reserved. Virtual Advanced Copyright © 1995-1997 Roland De Graaf. |