Re: puddles

> Again, in today's world, it is obvious an armed cititzenry is more likely to
> be victimized by its own people then the government.  If you are really that
> concerned about the government overtaking the U.S. I suggest you head north
> to Canada.

Oh, I don't know, if the government took over the U.S., would it stop
there? Canada and Mexico could be next, and it would be fairly easy.

I think all heads of households need to make the personal decision as to
whether or not to have firearms for protection, altho' I tend to agree
there is greater danger to children from the firearms then there is of
criminal intrusion under most -- but not all -- circumstances. It depends
in large part where one lives. The decision needs to be carefully weighed
as to potential benefit vs accident potential and ready acces vs securing
the weapon.

One thing to consider is, how many people do you personally know NEAR
your home that have been surprised by an unexpected intruder IN THE FLESH
compared to what you have read, heard or percieved in the media? Then cons-
ider kids if you have them, and how they are able to get into ANYTHING --
and they have been into more of your personal stuff than you will EVER
know or WILL know, I guarantee ya! 
ZED!

     ZED's ZEN SouthWest*915-699-5051*VirtualNet@1915020*Midland TX USA