AT2k Design BBS Message Area
Casually read the BBS message area using an easy to use interface. Messages are categorized exactly like they are on the BBS. You may post new messages or reply to existing messages! You are not logged in. Login here for full access privileges. |
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to General LAW Q&A <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
|
||||||
From | To | Subject | Date/Time | |||
Adam Thomas Ness | THUNDER | Re: erg |
September 28, 1995 10:05 PM * |
|||
As the Horrid Daemon Thunder #1 @1608000*1 rose from the pit it said Re: erg to Rainbird #273 @1618007*1 T#@> Re: Re: erg > they have no sex education! While condoms are primarily for the > prevention of disease, they also have a 70%+ effectivness when used for > birth control. ANY woman who has to get pregnant to get a man isn't > worth keeping anyway. SO why not just drop her like a hot rock? Offer T#@> 70% effectiveness? I always thought it was much higher then that? T#@> Like around 90...can anyone help us out with this one? It is very difficult to test the effectiveness, since it varys depending on usage. According to most sources I have heard, it is 99.9% effective WHEN USED PROPERLY. Misuse often can lead to unplanned pregnancies. Isaiah 55:8,9 "For My thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways My ways," declares the Lord. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are My ways higher than your ways, and My thoughts higher than your thoughts. � � Signet 1.10 Freeware � ... Make it as simple as possible, but no simpler. ___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12 |
||||||
|
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to General LAW Q&A <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
Execution Time: 0.02 seconds If you experience any problems with this website or need help, contact the webmaster. VADV-PHP Copyright © 2002-2024 Steve Winn, Aspect Technologies. All Rights Reserved. Virtual Advanced Copyright © 1995-1997 Roland De Graaf. |