AT2k Design BBS Message Area
Casually read the BBS message area using an easy to use interface. Messages are categorized exactly like they are on the BBS. You may post new messages or reply to existing messages! You are not logged in. Login here for full access privileges. |
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Friendly Debate (18+ please) <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
|
||||||
From | To | Subject | Date/Time | |||
Arelor | Kurt Weiske | Re: The Brittish Medical Journal is flagged as a fake news blog |
December 22, 2021 8:23 PM * |
|||
Re: Re: The Brittish Medical Journal is flagged as a fake news blog site By: Kurt Weiske to Arelor on Tue Dec 21 2021 08:18 am > -=> Arelor wrote to TheCivvie <=- > > Ar> I have migrated my family over to Signal Messenger. They keep their Facebooks > Ar> if they want to find me online they are going to have to play with my rules. > > > Ah, Christmastime - time to update grandma's laptop, check the modem, do all of th > family IT stuff. > > It might be time, with family all in one place, to move to a better > messaging platform. My family is 25% Android and 75% Apple, so I'd like to > get a cross-platform video and secure messaging app going. > > > ... Always the first steps I don't really do free IT for family anymore. My father uses some Linux I set for him, so he never getsserious breakages. My mother always was angry at me while I was fixing her problems and, once I was done, she kicked me out of the room without thanking me or anything, so I stopped fixing things for her. Signal is nice for text messages and images. It also does voice, but I can't recommend it for voice because if your network coverage is not good, it is unusable. Quality, secure, private videoconferencing is a problem still to be solved imo. There is Jitsi, which is FOSS and you could host oyurself if need be. The stack is a monster to set (and very dirty if you look at it) so people ends up using public instances. The problem is that you end up trusting the administrators of the public instance you use. This may be acceptable or not. Nextcloud talk is workable for 4 or less people. If you are already using Nextcloud and have an instance running, adding a Talk install to it may be an option. The issue is that stock Nextcloud cannot cope with big conferences (for legit, technical reasons) and that modifying it to cope with big groups is non trivial (to the point people buys a support contract for setting it up). I am not a fan of videoconferencing myself. It has its uses, but 95% of the time you only need audio. Even if you are in a meeting that requires you to deliver pictures and diagrams to other participants, many audiochat systems allow doing just that. I personally don't think the increased use of bandwidth and the complexity of implementation for video is worth it for most users* *Full disclosure, my connectivity sucks so the difference between Mumble and Jitsi with video is "It Works Great" vs "The chat is hogging all the bandwith and now my mother can't barely browse the web while I am in a virtual meeting" -- gopher://gopher.richardfalken.com/1/richardfalken --- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (618:250/24) |
||||||
|
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Friendly Debate (18+ please) <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
Execution Time: 0.0194 seconds If you experience any problems with this website or need help, contact the webmaster. VADV-PHP Copyright © 2002-2024 Steve Winn, Aspect Technologies. All Rights Reserved. Virtual Advanced Copyright © 1995-1997 Roland De Graaf. |