AT2k Design BBS Message Area
Casually read the BBS message area using an easy to use interface. Messages are categorized exactly like they are on the BBS. You may post new messages or reply to existing messages!

You are not logged in. Login here for full access privileges.

Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Friendly Debate (18+ please)  <--  <--- Return to Home Page
   Networked Database  Friendly Debate (18+ please)   [1550 / 1902] RSS
 From   To   Subject   Date/Time 
Message   Mike Powell    ROB MCCART   Inappropriate literature   July 9, 2023
 8:48 AM *  

> A final note..  My Niece is a teacher in lower grades, K to 4. Her school,
> like many, are pushing more coloured people content. Normally I'd say fine,
> show the kids early that they are people too and all around us. What is not
> fine? The school banned ALL books in the school library that had ANY white
> people in them. My niece, who has black friends and is not the least bit
> racist, had brought in a few harmless books of her own that had white people
> in them and they were confiscated.

They must not have very many books left.

> They are also teaching almost exclusively about LGBTQ++ to 5 and 6 year olds
> to the point where heterosexual kids may start to feel like they are wrong
> to feel the way they do. I can understand at that age teaching that Some
> families may have 2 mommies or 2 daddies but there should be a line..

> Is this where we are heading?..

I am not certain that the people pushing this agenda at young children are
a part of the LGBTQ++ movement.  I think a lot of them are politicians or
other nefarious individuals who have some other agenda.  There may be some
kids who know what their sexual orientation is at that age but I feel for
most, teaching children that young about sexual topics (even hetero) is a
giant mistake.  They are not mature enough mentally or emotionally to
handle such things, and it will only lead to trouble in their lives.

Here in the US there has been some attempts at getting sexually explicit
LGBTQ++ material into the libraries of younger students... not 2 moms or 2
dads materials, but books that include illustrations of things like two younger
same-sex persons fondling and performing other sex acts on each other.

I don't care if it is hetero... exposing children to such material when
they are too young to process it is damaging.  At the very least, I feel
the persons responsible don't want kids to have a childhood any more (porn
exposure will ruin that quick), but I suspect it goes far beyond that.

The people who act OK with it... the ones I know... are usually parents of
older kids who are somewhere on the non-binary spectrum.  As long as it
aligns with their own kid's feelings, they don't care what damage it might
do to others.  When our state overreacted by instituting a book ban law,
they couldn't understand that this overreaction was in direct reaction to
the overaction of whoever is pushing such material at kids.


 * SLMR 2.1a * Press any key to continue or any other key to quit
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
 * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (618:250/1)
  Show ANSI Codes | Hide BBCodes | Show Color Codes | Hide Encoding | Hide HTML Tags | Show Routing
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Friendly Debate (18+ please)  <--  <--- Return to Home Page

VADV-PHP
Execution Time: 0.0173 seconds

If you experience any problems with this website or need help, contact the webmaster.
VADV-PHP Copyright © 2002-2024 Steve Winn, Aspect Technologies. All Rights Reserved.
Virtual Advanced Copyright © 1995-1997 Roland De Graaf.
v2.1.241108