AT2k Design BBS Message Area
Casually read the BBS message area using an easy to use interface. Messages are categorized exactly like they are on the BBS. You may post new messages or reply to existing messages! You are not logged in. Login here for full access privileges. |
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Friendly Debate (18+ please) <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
|
||||||
From | To | Subject | Date/Time | |||
Arelor | Rob Mccart | Re: Midterms |
August 9, 2022 7:44 PM * |
|||
Re: Re: Midterms By: Rob Mccart to MARK HOFMANN on Mon Aug 01 2022 12:54 am > MH>All the power issues could have been prevented by allowing increased supp > >investments in more nuclear power. There is still no better low cost sou > >power than nuclear. > > Other than the nuclear waste issues.. Probably the best is Hydro Electric > power but few areas have ideal places to set that up. Zero pollution and we > have Hydro plants in Canada that have been running virtually unattended for > long that their output has to be converted from 25 cycle to 60 cycle power, > something that was changed over to in the mid 1950's. > > It's sort of turning out that solar and wind are also only reliable and > predictable in limited areas so there's no easy answer. Tidal generators tha > generate power both as the tide comes in and goes out (and the tides are > fairly reliable) might be another 'clean' option on ocean coasts. > > Also, as far as nuclear goes, there are stations that can be built that are > efficient that they could use the waste from regular nuclear power plants to > generate power, and Their waste is far less dangerous and lasts a fraction a > long, but you won't find many of those simply because they cost more to buil > > --- > * SLMR Rob * Can't remember... Must have been in another lifeform > * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (618:250/1) Hydro Electric is Awesome. It also has an advantage in that you can save up water during times you don't need it to use it later (up to a point). I am a fan of wind generators because they are cheap for what they are and they pack more kilowatts per euro than solar. Thermosolar is also great for home heating. Heliostats are just brutal. Those use mirrors to concentrate sunlight onto a mass of water, which boils and can be used to power a turbine. Too bad you can't place those everywhere. The problem with most of those is that they require "regular" resources to create and maintain. Sure, wind is great (even if burdned by unreliability) but it uses oil for lubrication and you can bet the concrete pilars aerogeneratorsd are placed on required hydrocarbridges. -- gopher://gopher.richardfalken.com/1/richardfalken --- SBBSecho 3.15-Linux * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (618:250/24) |
||||||
|
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Friendly Debate (18+ please) <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
Execution Time: 0.0187 seconds If you experience any problems with this website or need help, contact the webmaster. VADV-PHP Copyright © 2002-2024 Steve Winn, Aspect Technologies. All Rights Reserved. Virtual Advanced Copyright © 1995-1997 Roland De Graaf. |