AT2k Design BBS Message Area
Casually read the BBS message area using an easy to use interface. Messages are categorized exactly like they are on the BBS. You may post new messages or reply to existing messages!

You are not logged in. Login here for full access privileges.

Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Slashdot  <--  <--- Return to Home Page
   Local Database  Slashdot   [175 / 274] RSS
 From   To   Subject   Date/Time 
Message   VRSS    All   Chinese Robotaxis Have Government Black Boxes, Approach US Quali   April 14, 2025
 10:40 PM  

Feed: Slashdot
Feed Link: https://slashdot.org/
---

Title: Chinese Robotaxis Have Government Black Boxes, Approach US Quality

Link: https://tech.slashdot.org/story/25/04/14/2327...

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Forbes: Robotaxi development is
speeding at a fast pace in China, but we don't hear much about it in the USA,
where the news focuses mostly on Waymo, with a bit about Zoox, Motional, May,
trucking projects and other domestic players. China has 4 main players with
robotaxi service, dominated by Baidu (the Chinese Google.) A recent session
at last week's Ride AI conference in Los Angeles revealed some details about
the different regulatory regime in China, and featured a report from a
Chinese-American YouTuber who has taken on a mission to ride in the different
vehicles. Zion Maffeo, deputy general counsel for Pony.AI, provided some
details on regulations in China. While Pony began with U.S. operations, its
public operations are entirely in China, and it does only testing in the USA.
Famously it was one of the few companies to get a California "no safety
driver" test permit, but then lost it after a crash, and later regained it.
Chinese authorities at many levels keep a close watch over Chinese robotaxi
companies. They must get approval for all levels of operation which control
where they can test and operate, and how much supervision is needed.
Operation begins with testing with a safety driver behind the wheel (as
almost everywhere in the world,) with eventual graduation to having the
safety driver in the passenger seat but with an emergency stop. Then they
move to having a supervisor in the back seat before they can test with nobody
in the vehicle, usually limited to an area with simpler streets. The big jump
can then come to allow testing with nobody in the vehicle, but with full time
monitoring by a remote employee who can stop the vehicle. From there they can
graduate to taking passengers, and then expanding the service to more complex
areas. Later they can go further, and not have full time remote monitoring,
though there do need to be remote employees able to monitor and assist part
time. Pony has a permit allowing it to have 3 vehicles per remote operator,
and has one for 15 vehicles in process, but they declined comment on just how
many vehicles they actually have per operator. Baidu also did not respond to
queries on this. [...] In addition, Chinese jurisdictions require that the
system in a car independently log any "interventions" by safety drivers in a
sort of "black box" system. These reports are regularly given to regulators,
though they are not made public. In California, companies must file an annual
disengagement report, but they have considerable leeway on what they consider
a disengagement so the numbers can't be readily compared. Chinese companies
have no discretion on what is reported, and they may notify authorities of a
specific objection if they wish to declare that an intervention logged in
their black box should not be counted. On her first trip, YouTuber Sophia
Tung found Baidu's 5th generation robotaxi to offer a poor experience in ride
quality, wait time, and overall service. However, during a return trip she
tried Baidu's 6th generation vehicle in Wuhan and rated it as the best among
Chinese robotaxis, approaching the quality of Waymo.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

---
VRSS v2.1.180528
  Show ANSI Codes | Hide BBCodes | Show Color Codes | Hide Encoding | Hide HTML Tags | Show Routing
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Slashdot  <--  <--- Return to Home Page

VADV-PHP
Execution Time: 0.0147 seconds

If you experience any problems with this website or need help, contact the webmaster.
VADV-PHP Copyright © 2002-2025 Steve Winn, Aspect Technologies. All Rights Reserved.
Virtual Advanced Copyright © 1995-1997 Roland De Graaf.
v2.1.250224