Regarding: That depends...

��������������������� ����[ You Said These Wordz ]����������������������
      You say it's reliable.... NOT....   In the last month I've had it crash
 11 times and I've had to reinstall it 4 times.  The fix packs I got from MS
 only helped a tiny bit.
      I have a dx166, 128 megs of EDO, 4 1.6 WD's etc...  I'm doing heavy
 graphics and win95 just eats it.  I'm still waiting on my copy of NT 4.0, MS
 has been real slow in sending it.
      I have on another system (pent 75, 64 megs EDO, 4 1.2 Conners.....) WFG
 3.11 and that has only lockup once or twice in the past 6 months.  It's had a
 much better record than 95 has...
      So your statment is WRONG..........

������������������ ����[ Now I Must Reply With ]��� ������������������


Well I say that *I* have not had any problems.. and I have several friends
that don't have problems. But I have a lot of experience with Windows, since
I build control systems using dos/windows I really know the ins and outs..
maybe there is something that you are missing. You should start with a blank
HD, then install Win95, then install everything on top of that... That always
works great for me.  I will agree that Win 95 is not with out it's problems,
but what you get out of it is messured by the level you put in. If you think
that Windows NT will help YOU are the one that is wrong. It's just as
unstable as all the other Windows platforms. Why don't you try OS/2 Warp, it
rules! hehe..

-�orley  [corley@why.net]
         [http://www.why.net/users/corley]

   ThE EleCtriC LoungE � Garland, Texas USA � (97�)-53o-1953 � VBBS 7oo
 Unlimited File Storage � GameZ � Custom Scripts � QWK � 7 Nets � No Ratios!