AT2k Design BBS Message Area
Casually read the BBS message area using an easy to use interface. Messages are categorized exactly like they are on the BBS. You may post new messages or reply to existing messages! You are not logged in. Login here for full access privileges. |
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Windows Workshop <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
|
||||||
From | To | Subject | Date/Time | |||
Badman | The Electric Head | Memory and Win95 |
May 13, 1997 2:01 AM |
|||
Re: right... but... > ok....a little clarification here....buying gobs of memory only enhances the > speed/performance of a program....base memory (the first 640k) is where the > programs actually reside and execute into extended memory... > Any Win95 experts care to concur with the above? or disagree? Okay. THE MORE RAM WITH WIN95, THE BETTER. The heart beats at 8 megs, the blood moves at 16, but it really isn't until 32 megs that the legs actually start to move. With Windows 95, adding more ram can speed things up more than a processor upgrade! As for the whole 640k thing, this is still true ONLY FOR 16-BIT APPLICATIONS. DOS and Win 3.1 apps will still have to work under the 640k limit even in Win95. Fortnately, Windows' virtual device drivers free up a LOT of conventional memory. And NUTS to that guy who claimed to speed up Win95 with SmartDrive. You cannot speed up Win95 by taking ram away from it. Use the internal disk caching instead, it's in System Properties, under the Performance tab. Set it as far to the right as you feel comfortable with. Win95 will tell you how much ram you just reserved for disk caching. Any questions? Comments? Badman |
||||||
|
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Windows Workshop <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
Execution Time: 0.0195 seconds If you experience any problems with this website or need help, contact the webmaster. VADV-PHP Copyright © 2002-2024 Steve Winn, Aspect Technologies. All Rights Reserved. Virtual Advanced Copyright © 1995-1997 Roland De Graaf. |