Re: That depends...

>> You don't know what you are saying.. I have a Pentium, 75 and it runs WAY
>> faster than my old 486 with Win 3.11.. That version of Windows is the worst
>> ever made. MOVE to WIN 95 It works great and is very reliable.
>> -�orley  [corley@why.net]
>     You say it's reliable.... NOT....   In the last month I've had it crash
>11 times and I've had to reinstall it 4 times.  The fix packs I got from MS
>only helped a tiny bit.
>     I have a dx166, 128 megs of EDO, 4 1.6 WD's etc...  I'm doing heavy
>graphics and win95 just eats it.  I'm still waiting on my copy of NT 4.0, MS
>has been real slow in sending it.
>     I have on another system (pent 75, 64 megs EDO, 4 1.2 Conners.....) WFG
>3.11 and that has only lockup once or twice in the past 6 months.  It's had a
>much better record than 95 has...
>     So your statment is WRONG..........
>                                                       Desdinova...

  It's kind of relative.  I installed Win95 a year ago and can leave it
running for months at a time without any trouble.  Me thinks you're picking
nits when telling him his statement is wrong.  For most situations, Win95 is
quite sufficient and stable.
  For your applications though, perhaps NT would be better.
                                            khan@why.net
                                      http:/users.why.net/khan

    The Jungle | Dallas | internet@snook.com | MultiNet | VirtualNet@1214006
           My child is an honor student at Ayn Rand School for Tots
              Keep an open mind, but don't let your brains fall out.