Re: That depends...

>       You say it's reliable.... NOT....   In the last month I've had it crash
>  11 times and I've had to reinstall it 4 times.  The fix packs I got from MS
>  only helped a tiny bit.
>       I have a dx166, 128 megs of EDO, 4 1.6 WD's etc...  I'm doing heavy
>  graphics and win95 just eats it.  I'm still waiting on my copy of NT 4.0, MS
>  has been real slow in sending it.
> ������������������ ����[ Now I Must Reply With ]��� ������������������
>
> Well I say that *I* have not had any problems.. and I have several friends
> that don't have problems. But I have a lot of experience with Windows, since
> I build control systems using dos/windows I really know the ins and outs..
> maybe there is something that you are missing. You should start with a blank
> HD, then install Win95, then install everything on top of that... That always
> works great for me.  I will agree that Win 95 is not with out it's problems,
> but what you get out of it is messured by the level you put in. If you think

     Thats what I have done on all my reinstalls.  I wipe the drives and
start from scratch.  The system just dosen't like Win95.  MS has no clue why.

     As for OS/2, if I could get it to install on just one of the 6 systems I
have I'd try it.  I haven't been able get through all the errors.

     I do run Linux though, and I found that fairly easy to install.  It's
fun to play with too.  Now if some one would just code a version of VBBS for
it..

                                                     Desdinova...