AT2k Design BBS Message Area
Casually read the BBS message area using an easy to use interface. Messages are categorized exactly like they are on the BBS. You may post new messages or reply to existing messages! You are not logged in. Login here for full access privileges. |
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Windows 95 Discussion <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
|
||||||
From | To | Subject | Date/Time | |||
Peter | JeremyT1 | Multitasking?!? |
March 10, 1996 12:39 PM * |
|||
Re: Multitasking?!? > > > #2, I don't believe it's really fair to compare Windows 95 to OS/2 Warp. > > > Windows 95 is not Microsoft's full 32-bit operating system. Windows NT i > > AIX is IBM's full 32-bit operating system....what's not fair? > > -Papa Smurf > What's not fair is that you are comparing a 16/32-bit OS to a 32-bit OS. The > fair comparison is OS/2 vs. Windows NT. 32-bit vs 32-bit. AIX is strictly > RS/6000, not one bit PC based, so that's not a fair comparison either. Good point...I suspected that it might only run on the RS/6000's but wasn't sure..(got to play with an aix box for a while...) anyways fair fair fair....if everything were completly fair, There could be no clear winner. What I think is best basis for comparision is the market/use that these operating systems were intended for. Win95 was boasted by microsoft as a 32-bit operating system for home/business use. The same I think applys to OS/2. WindowsNT currently is targeted twoards busines...mission criticle applications. Not video games, and little toy trains. (or is that toy -trains and video games). -Papa Smurf |
||||||
|
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Windows 95 Discussion <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
Execution Time: 0.0157 seconds If you experience any problems with this website or need help, contact the webmaster. VADV-PHP Copyright © 2002-2024 Steve Winn, Aspect Technologies. All Rights Reserved. Virtual Advanced Copyright © 1995-1997 Roland De Graaf. |