Re: Why...  ????  which is better...

> >      You say Win95, but why.  You give no info.  You do no qualify your
> > statement with ANY facts.  All we have is supposion.
> >      I found Win95 to be an incredible nightmare.  75% of all my apps would
> > not work.  It had the hardest time finding my SCSI drives and when it did i
> > wouldn't report any past drive G.
> >      The only solutuion was to wipe the boot drive, throw Win95 in the Tras
> > and buy  Win Nt 3.51.  No problems at all...

> If you have a network like the one I'm guessing you have, why didn't you just
> buy WindowsNT in the first place.  Second of all, how will 75% of your apps
> not work at all.  I find that a little bit of exagaration.  75%???!!!  C'mon!
> DEFENDER

     Well for one, my Corel draw wouldn't work, nor my Wordperfect 6.2.  It
couldn't find my Autocad 13.  Most of my shareware windows apps didn't want
to work properly - lots of GPF errors.  I spent 2 weeks with MS support and
it took them that long just to get Corel working.

     Thats why I went to NT.

     Oh by the way.  MS is ditching DOS, Win3.x and Win95.  The latest issue
of EET has info on the Intel/HP project for a 64 bit UNIX based OS.  This is
designed to run on Intels new P7 series CPU's.  In the article they had a
quote from Gates " Good now we can finally get rid of DOS & Windows 3.x and
95"   Win95 development is to be totally cut off of Dec. 31 1996.

     Guess everyone gets to upgrade to NT whether they want to or not...

     Desdinova...