AT2k Design BBS Message Area
Casually read the BBS message area using an easy to use interface. Messages are categorized exactly like they are on the BBS. You may post new messages or reply to existing messages! You are not logged in. Login here for full access privileges. |
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Windows 95 Discussion <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
|
||||||
From | To | Subject | Date/Time | |||
Diamond Dave | Alex Hirsch | now |
March 20, 1996 9:48 PM * |
|||
Re: now > now you know thats not true my friend. Many of us HAVE tried os/2 and stil > have become Bill Gate's lemmings regardless Its not too late to give up Winblows 95 before its too late > But seriously, people who run Os/2 are so incredibly biased. This may be just > a sterotype but every person who I've ever met that ran os/2 has made an > effort to put down any and all other os's. I have run both win95 and os/2 and > I personally like win95 better. Os/2 doesn't suck, its a nice operating > system, and it has a better engine than win95, but its just not mainstream > enough. It doesn't run my DOS and win3.1 applications nearly as nice as > win95. Both operating systems have their pluses and minuses, and i hate it > when you os/2 users walk in and start insulting everyone who doesn't feel the > same way you do. DOS programs run MUCH better in OS/2 than they did in Win95. OS/2 multi-tasks better than Win 95. I ran Win 95 and it kept crashing (especially VBBS). OS/2 give me very little problems (I even got VBBS for OS/2 - works even nicer than the DOS version did) I just wish IBM marketed OS/2 better *** Diamond Dave *** Sysop - Diamond Mine BBS |
||||||
|
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Windows 95 Discussion <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
Execution Time: 0.0157 seconds If you experience any problems with this website or need help, contact the webmaster. VADV-PHP Copyright © 2002-2024 Steve Winn, Aspect Technologies. All Rights Reserved. Virtual Advanced Copyright © 1995-1997 Roland De Graaf. |