Re: Re: [VirtualNET open?]...
> I recall, many years ago, when Roland told me of his plans to release an OS/2
> version, that I told him he should do a Windows version first, because far
> more people use Windows than OS/2. I and the other utility developers were
> almost all uninterested in starting work on OS/2 versions.
> When he wouldn't change his mind, I then offered to develop a Windows version
> in parallel to his development of an OS/2 version, so he could release Window
> and OS/2 versions at the same time, but he rejected that offer too.
> Now, we see the consequences. An OS/2 version that can't compete with the DOS
> version because none of the utilities that make the complete VBBS "package" s
> great are available in OS/2, and still no Windows version.
I see your point, but I'd also like to add that the PCBoard folks made a
native OS/2 version of their software and not a windows version, but yet they
made a local message base reader for windows.
Weird marketing strategy eh?
Talal
������������������������������������������������������������������������Ŀ
� Windows Online America VNet @1404003 RushNET @40400 (404) 477-8942 �
��������������������������������������������������������������������������
|
VBBS Software Announcements 
