Last time, Stuart Lauderdale #50 @18 said this to Mike Wingeier #1 @1619033:


 SL#@> Un-aberrated dynamics.

 SL#@> Here's where I come from:
 SL#@> There are four dynamics.
 SL#@> Dynamic 1 consists of self-preservation.
 SL#@> Dynamic 2 consists of sex/children.
 SL#@> Dynamic 3 consists of groups.
 SL#@> Dynamic 4 consists of species.
 SL#@> Any decision that harms more dynamics than it helps is a
 SL#@> contrasurvival one. For example, a person who sought to gain millions
 SL#@> of dollars at the cost of destroying the environment would be making an
 SL#@> improper decision. In fact, any serious violation of any dynamic is
 SL#@> usually contrasurvival. There are exceptions, such as completely
 SL#@> ignoring the first dynamic to save your child (second dynamic).

 SL#@> There are, of course, more dynamics; other critters of the earth, the
 SL#@> earth itself, survival towards infinity, etc. However, I only needed
 SL#@> four to demonstrate my point.

 SL#@> I'll give ten points to the person who can tell me who originated
 SL#@> dynamic theory.

Thanks for your input, now I'd like Dave's, since the question was directed at
him, and I know that if I don't ask him again, he'll ignore it.
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12