AT2k Design BBS Message Area
Casually read the BBS message area using an easy to use interface. Messages are categorized exactly like they are on the BBS. You may post new messages or reply to existing messages!

You are not logged in. Login here for full access privileges.

Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Debate of Philosophy  <--  <--- Return to Home Page
   Local Database  Debate of Philosophy   [143 / 250] RSS
 From   To   Subject   Date/Time 
Message   David Brandenburger    Stuart Lauderdale   ????   September 30, 1995
 9:39 AM *  

Re: ????

> Well, whoever originated it, it works great! (I took the Success through
> Communication course.)
> Scientology was not based on one single course. It was the next step after
> Dianetics, a science, to Scientology, a religion (because it holds that a
> being is spiritual in nature, not blinking out of existence at death but
> instead being sent into a new body).

I spent over a year with Scientology, quite some time ago. To this day they
are still compleatly LACKING in RELATIONSHIPS (man/woman) material.
Periodically, whenever I am in a new town I will take their "TEST". I love
how some 'director' will then want to know HOW did I 'classify as a "CLEAR"?
They are fun to play with. But basically they bore me.
IMHO
Dave B.
  Show ANSI Codes | Hide BBCodes | Show Color Codes | Hide Encoding | Hide HTML Tags | Show Routing
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Debate of Philosophy  <--  <--- Return to Home Page

VADV-PHP
Execution Time: 0.0186 seconds

If you experience any problems with this website or need help, contact the webmaster.
VADV-PHP Copyright © 2002-2024 Steve Winn, Aspect Technologies. All Rights Reserved.
Virtual Advanced Copyright © 1995-1997 Roland De Graaf.
v2.1.241108