--[ Begin Quote ]-------------------------------------------
     What you remember being photographed is not the Tachyon particle, but a
photograph that provides evidence that a tachyon particle has passed.  Since
it moves faster than `C' a photograph cannot capture its image.  It can
however capture its after image.   And the person to said that if he saw
proof of this, that he would ??? (Kissie Kissie).  Its people like that who
stiffle those of us who can grasp creative Physics.
--[ End Quote (About time.) ]-------------------------------

I said that I would kiss my ass if someone had proof of the existence of a
faster than light particle, and I stand fully by that statement.  If someone
found tachyons it would merit an instant Nobel prize and be front page news
in every city on the continent.  The discovery that the speed of light is not
the maximum velocity of the universe would create the biggest sensation in
the world of physics since the invention of the A-bomb.

"Creative Physics" -- you care to define that for me?  Although, in truth, I
think I know EXACTLY the type of physics you're referring to.