Re: God

> > Lets keep this scientific here boys...If God exists, and it can be proven,
> > why would that invalidate His existance?  Nothing I've read indicates that
> > God requires faith and only faith to acknowledge his existance.  If we coul
> > know with certainty, I'm pretty sure that would be ok.   BTW:I believe God
> > exists, but that His existance cannot be proved with the scientific method
> > (which requires observation and repeatibility among other things...)
> UGH!   Okay so you are saying GOd exists but we cannot prove it... because
> of lack of evidence. <we cannot have repeated obersavations blah blah blah>
> Right?  Therefore it would save to say I have um... a third arm... TRUE you
> cannot see it, TRUE I have no "designer" shirts and also three there is no
> medical "proof" (who needs prove when you can just throw out the basic laws
> of science anyways <G> saying that I do BUT by using your logic and methods
> of collecting data <there is no data about God therefore He HAS to exist> or
> lack thereof data THEN I have to have a third arm because YOU cannot prove I
> do not!!!!!

I'm saying what your first reply line re-states: I believe God exists, but I
can't prove it by the scientific method.  And I believe you don't have a third
arm, but again I can't prove it either way.
     Emory

������_     _  _     _ ��� the Electronic Warfare BBS ��� _     _  _     _���ķ
�    / \   / \/ \   /  VirtualNet 1301002 College Park, MD \   / \/ \   / \   �
���_/   \_/      \_/    24 hrs 1-301-454-9407 14,400/V42    \_/      \_/   \_Ľ