Re: .BAT Compiler wanted...

> The original version of BAT2EXEC was terrible. It would not compile
> for most people most of the time. The author keep working on it
> until version 1.5, at which time he apparently lost interest.
> Version 1.5 works reasonably well, but still lacks a lot in the
> way of transparent bat to com compiling.

     I had tried a few times and found it workable, though a few changes in
the BAT were perhaps needed to accomodate the program which seemed to consider
certain calls as errors. With the speed of most systems today, and the desire
to go and meddle with the file contents often, I happened to find no reason
to go on using it.
     But who's to say what might be helpful in someone else's situation.
Sometimes having something to work with is more enlightening and satisying
than not having it at all merely because it is flawed. Perhaps you or someone
else out there might (have) tied up the loose ends and solved all the
problems?

                                 ��Carloman

��������������۲������۲����������Carlomania�������������������������۲�������
�ν�������������������{��}v7.00�@1610069�Nazareth.PA{��}��������������������ν