Re: Tape restore porblem

> You know....I started using HPFS....I thought WOW!  No more defraging, faster
> access...etc.  Then I found out you only get about a 4% increase in disk
> performance, it takes 200K of memory to use, and it's not compatible with a
> lot of disk utilities.  I run FAT with OS/2.  That way I can use CP Backup,
> Stacker for OS/2, etc.

I'm also using FAT with OS/2... to use HPFS, I'd have to repartition my
hard drive and backup and restore everything.  Sounds like too much work.
I defrag once a week, booting to MS-DOS from a floppy.  While defragging
files is VERY fast and moves virtually nothing, defragging with full
optimization takes forever... like 45 minutes.  It used to take 20.  I
haven't really come to any conclusions on why this is; I guess OS/2 just
writes to the HD a lot.

Does CP Backup have support for tape drives?  I have a Colorado Jumbo 250
but I can't get the DOS or WINDOWS version of the software to work through
OS/2 at all; again I have to boot to MS-DOS via floppy.  Anyone have any
ideas on this?