To: Vince Rathbun #1 @1512046
Subject: Re: 640k is not 'nuff...

VR>Not I.  And I believe you forgot the original reason for my post.  First off
  >I am not making this a Win95 vs. OS/2.  Im simply stating the facts -- Win95
  >will offer VERY VERY VERY little advantages to the office. Every benchmark
  >rates Win 3.11 so much better than Win95. Graphics, to Disk, to Load time, t
  >anything.  Even PC Mag (As biased as they are) has said that 95 is not as
  >fast, and will be of little use to the office.

I agree, go DOS, Win 3.11, Win NT, or OS/2; but Win 95 is a dead end,
no matter how appealing they make it.

There will be a lot of pressure to upgrade in the near future,
but you'll be better off in the long run either doing it right or
putting it off.